In recent weeks, in addition to the mayor Infortune inconvenience of being driven to jail for contempt a military police traffic, others took issue talks of sidewalk tables in bars and friendly gatherings. The public watches passively Pico (again) the more a collection of tax without proper understanding of how the money will be invested by the City through unfounded 'Costing the Public Lighting Service'. The recovery has surprised those who thought most pay only a 'simple' tax collection. The substantial increase outraged. And, contrary to what one might imagine, were not only the less affluent who have felt the 'weight' in the pocket. From all sides, men and women sought their rights against abusive collection.
The prosecutor, in his paper, tried to represent with a Public Civil Action, but the process had been rejected and terminated, ie, without any condition of appeal. This is surprising me. I'm not here to judge the merit of court, because, according to prosecutors, the collection of the fee is legal, but the excessive increase of the tax is illegal.
As I stressed this article is not intended to question the court's decision since the Prosecutor has already taken as a measure on a request to withdraw the decision. Ahead, I ask: Are you satisfied with street lighting provided by Eletrobras Piauí and subsidized by the city?
And no cheating and think 'could be worse' ... That's no excuse! Nor is the excuse always indicate municipal problem as some typo or mistake in the tax percentage of the tax. This does not stick anymore!
would like to write to the frustration and outrage is the focus of a few malcontents, but is not. I take as an example the district Emmaus, near illumining Avenida Severo Eulalio, in the urban area of \u200b\u200bthe city only got electrification through the struggle of its residents, some had to take money out of pocket to have electricity at home because the streets (which also has no sidewalks or sewage disposal) are to dark.
I would really, really write that this is also peculiar to the district Emmaus, but is not. Thus in most neighborhoods. Fathers of the peripheral floor of the bourgeoisie's Corner of the Meadow. Another example: in a certain location on Avenida Sá Mr Nettle, neighborhood Junco, the stretch of intense movement of vehicles near two gas stations are in darkness for a month. Exposition Park, and Good Luck, Rhinestones, Stone Crossing ... You see? There are a few.
is for these and others that the excuse that 'has been worse' is not admissible. It's immoral! Does this mean that the next mayor will only change the bulbs in the posts that put down their management? Or take power only to the streets and neighborhoods where Gil and Joe Neri never set foot?
City Hall, the State Government and the Union may levy taxes yes, but they all must have visible return in society. This privilege comes the union of organized civil society to fight for their rights peacefully. Charge of public investment is not persecution nor identify himself as the situation or opposition. It is to be consistent with their sweaty work and struggle to earn money at the end of the month.
Well, while the investments will not salaried player or friend of the great fortunes, but who earns his money with dignity, NO can expect their rights to fight the lights out of ...
By Denilson Pereirah
Professional Journalist
0 comments:
Post a Comment